Brief
Minnesota has transitioned Family Residential Services (FRS) to a flat-rate reimbursement system, replacing the individualized DWRS framework that matched funding to each person's actual, assessed care needs. This change is already causing harm to providers and the individuals they serve.
FRS is structured around the individual. It is:
- Based on individualized assessments through MnCHOICES
- Governed by person-centered planning requirements
- Required to meet federal HCBS standards under 42 CFR 441.301
- Delivered under 245D Minnesota Statute
Flat rates break this model.
Claims that providers earn "$1M+ annually" are inaccurate.
Typical example: $409/day × 3 residents × 365 days = $447,855 gross — before expenses including:
- 24/7 staffing, often at 1:1 or 2:1 ratios
- Awake overnight staff
- Payroll taxes and insurance
- Housing, food, transportation
- Medical coordination and compliance
This is the cost of care — not profit.
Providers are reporting systemic problems at May 2026 renewals that compound the damage of the flat-rate transition.
- Lower case mix levels assigned at renewal
- No corresponding decrease in individual needs
- Case managers deferring to assessors without recourse
- No transparency in how lower tiers are assigned
- Funding artificially reduced through the assessment process
- Individuals effectively penalized for stable care outcomes
- Providers unable to appeal or seek correction
- Accountability removed from the rate-setting process
- FRS homes will close across the state
- Individuals forced into more restrictive, more costly settings
- Costs to the state will increase, not decrease
- Providers face compliance risk under federal HCBS rules
- Minnesota's Olmstead Plan community integration goals are reversed
- Flat rate pays only for "staffing hours" — not total provider costs
- Current hourly rates range from $8.12 to $15.97 under the flat system
- CRS facilities pay a minimum of $20.50/hour
- Staff will not work for below-market wages when alternatives exist
- DWRS covered staffing, transportation, programming, benefits, and administration
There is no workable percentage adjustment to the flat rate. The system is fundamentally incompatible with the variable-acuity nature of Family Residential Services.
MARSH is requesting full restoration of FRS to the DWRS rate methodology — the framework that was already working before this transition.
This is not a budget issue. This is a human rights issue.The 2026 legislative session ends May 18. Both chambers are assembling omnibus bills now. Your voice can still move this.
MARSH • admin@marshmn.org • marshmn.org
Minnesota Association of Residential Service Homes — 245A / 245D / FRS / AFC / HCBS